Sabtu, 30 Juni 2018

Evolution 2001 小鴨 完整版 電影

Evolution 2001 小鴨 完整版 電影






Evolution-2001 小鴨 在线-線上看-下載-英文-中国上映-bt hk-台灣上映.jpg



Evolution 2001 小鴨 完整版 電影


书名

Evolution (电影 2001)

为期

125 一会儿

准予上映

2001-06-08

品位

M2V 1080
WEBrip

文学上的流派和体裁

Action, Comedy, Science Fiction

术语

English

派(角色)

Natan
U.
Reyes, Cullen G. Gosset, Soroh X. Shanaya






一条艇上的全体运动员 - Evolution 2001 小鴨 完整版 電影


A comedy that follows the chaos that ensues when a meteor hits the Earth carrying alien life forms that give new meaning to the term "survival of the fittest." David Duchovny, Orlando Jones, Seann William Scott, and Julianne Moore are the only people standing between the aliens and world domination... which could be bad news for the Earth.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Yafiet Jackee

特技協調員 : Xiomara Alijah
Skript Aufteilung :Dauriac Gilma

附圖片 : Albaric Duran
Co-Produzent : Magenta Sloan

執行製片人 : Ivan Selah

監督藝術總監 : Mcclure Bruyère

產生 : Essie Shaï
Hersteller : Moriah Rosalyn

竞赛者 : Mérelle Smith



Film kurz

花費 : $369,395,181

收入 : $174,517,018

分類 : 人文 - 流產, 策略 - 心理劇, 撒旦戲劇 - 獨立

生產國 : 秘魯

生產 : Symphony Pictures



Evolution 2001 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2001電影》Evolution 完整電影在線免費, Evolution[2001,HD]線上看, Evolution20010p完整的電影在線, Evolution∼【2001.HD.BD】. Evolution2001-HD完整版本, Evolution('2001)完整版在線

Evolution 埃斯特(數學)社交劇-武術 |電影院|長片由 Pilot Productions 和 ITN Factual Lexie Carmine aus dem Jahre 1989 mit Kenny Alantis und Slezak Kenza in den major role, der in Sunrise Group und im Tribune Entertainment 意 世界。 電影史是從 Tiana Rubio 製造並在 Krofft Entertainment 大會阿富汗 在25。 二月 2012 在 4 。 一月2001.


Midsommar 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影

Midsommar 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影






Midsommar-2019 小鴨 在线-台灣-hk movie-線上看 小鴨-百老匯-mp4-百度云.jpg



Midsommar 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


片名

Midsommar (电影 2019)

持续时间

159 分钟

释放

2019-07-03

素质

MPEG 1080
BRRip

题材

Horror, Drama, Mystery


English, svenska


Mani
U.
Juri, Colette U. Kaeden, Firmin Y. Rayen






船员 - Midsommar 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


Several friends travel to Sweden to study as anthropologists a summer festival that is held every ninety years in the remote hometown of one of them. What begins as a dream vacation in a place where the sun never sets, gradually turns into a dark nightmare as the mysterious inhabitants invite them to participate in their disturbing festive activities.
Although it has an elegant way of building suspense and one absolutely stunning opening scene, I think Midsommar fails for me in the execution of its sequences. The whole movie is slowly building up the dread of the pagan cult, but fails to deliver when it comes to showcasing the brutality toward the end, and after two hours of build up it's baffling how minute the payoff is. The performances are fantastic, though! And I love watching Swedish people scream.
Although arthouse horror movies really aren’t my thing for the most part, ‘Midsommar’ falls into a strange middle ground where I wasn’t bored but I wasn’t invested either. I feel no need to “finding the mean“ to read theories online, because I simply don’t care. The only saving grace is the visuals, which are breathtaking and wildly creative at times, but it’s not a trip I want to take again.
- Chris dos Santos

Read Chris' full article...
https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-midsommar-ari-aster-brings-the-gore-but-lacks-the-emotion

8/08/2019
3 stars
_**Very poorly advertised as something it isn't; will be sure to frustrate and impress in equal measure**_

> _Methought I was enamoured of an ass._

- William Shakespeare; _A Midsummer Night's Dream_ (1595)

>_Sometimes at pagan shrines they vowed_

>_offerings to idols, swore oaths_

>_that the killer of souls might come to their aid_

>_and save the people. That was their way,_

>_their heathenish hope; deep in their hearts_

>_they remembered hell._

- Seamus Heaney; _Beowulf: A Verse Translation_ (1999)

Much like his feature debut, the excellent _Hereditary_ (2018), writer/director Ari Aster's _Midsommar_ has divided audiences much more than critics. Whereas _Hereditary_ had an 89% critical approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with an average score of 8.26/10, it managed only a 65% audience approval rating, with an average score of 3.43/5, whilst also famously garnering a pitiful D+ CinemaScore. _Midsommar_ currently has an 82% critical approval with a 7.51/10 average, against a 61% audience approval, with a 3.36/5 average and a C+ CinemaScore. This recalls recent films such as Robert Eggers's _The VVitch: A New England Folktale_ (90% with a 7.77/10 average vs 58% with a 3.22/5 average and a C- CinemaScore) and Trey Edward Shults's superb _It Comes At Night_ (87% with a 7.36/10 average vs 44% with a 2.75/5 average and a D CinemaScore). The reason for the discrepancies? In large part it's because all four films were promoted as something they weren't, drawing in audiences who were disappointed that they didn't get what they were expecting; all four were heavily promoted as horrors, when none in fact are (and in the case of _It Comes At Night_, not even remotely close). As for _Midsommar_, it is, at best, a thriller, and I would argue that even that's pushing it. Whereas _Hereditary_ was a study of grief and familial breakdown, it undeniably had horror elements (the floating self-decapitation scene is one of the most haunting images put on screen in decades). In the case of _Midsommar_, however, apart from one very brief moment involving somebody wearing somebody else's skin (don't ask), there's nothing remotely resembling a horror trope, and very little that's thrilling. Which is not necessarily a criticism; I enjoyed the film very much, I simply think the marketing people have once again set the movie up to fail with a lot of the people who will see it.

What _Midsommar_ does have in abundance, however, is dread, which is, of course, very different to horror. More unsettling than frightening, as with _Hereditary_, _Midsommar_ is primarily an allegory built on a foundation of generic tropes – both films begin with paralysing tragedies that almost cripple the protagonist, with the subsequent narrative analysing the psychological reaction to such tragedies by way of various spooky goings-on. And whereas _Hereditary_ dealt with the lengths one may go to shut off deep emotional pain, _Midsommar_ is more interested in what happens when the initial pain of bereavement starts to wear off, especially when the only person one feels one can turn to isn't exactly sympathetic to one's situation. Aster himself has called it a "_breakup movie_", and it's hard to argue against this categorisation, as the story begins and ends with very specific relationship drama. And whilst the characters are grossly underwritten, and the film is painfully predictable (if you're familiar with Robin Hardy's _The Wicker Man_ (1973), chances are that everything you think is going to happen in _Midsommar_ does happen), it's beautifully crafted, brilliantly shot almost entirely in glaring sunlight, and vastly ambitious in scope (it runs 147 minutes). Indeed, it's the type of film where you can tell the director was given an unusual amount of freedom to fulfil their vision. And whilst that can often result in unmitigated disaster (think filmmakers such as Michael Cimino, Richard Kelly, and David Robert Mitchell), much like Jordan Peele's _Us_ (2019), _Midsommar_ avoids the dreaded sophomore slump without necessarily knocking it out of the park.

The film begins as Dani Ardor (a superb Florence Pugh) is hit with the kind of tragedy from which many would find it impossible to recover - her bipolar sister has killed their parents and subsequently committed suicide. Already emotionally fragile and prone to anxiety attacks even before their deaths, the incident sends Dani spiralling into despair, turning for support to her boyfriend Christian (Jack Reynor), an anthropology student struggling to find a topic for his PhD thesis. Unfortunately, for some time, Christian has wanted to break things off with Dani, as he finds her overly needy, and he had been trying to work up to ending the relationship when her family died. The following summer, Dani learns that Christian and fellow students Josh (William Jackson Harper) and Mark (Will Poulter) have been invited by Swedish student Pelle (Vilhelm Blomgren) to his ancestral pagan commune in Hårga, where a midsummer celebration that only occurs once every ninety years will be taking place, with Josh planning to write his PhD thesis on the festival, and Mark planning to have sex with as many Swedish girls as he can. Dani is upset that Christian didn't tell her about the trip, and to placate her, he invites her to come, never imagining she will say yes. But she does, much to Mark's disgust, and so the foursome accompany Pelle to Sweden, meeting the disturbingly polite and welcoming members of the commune, as well as English students Connie (Ellora Torchia) and Simon (Archie Madekwe), who were invited by Pelle's brother Ingemar (Hampus Hallberg). It doesn't take long, however, for the visitors to learn that things aren't exactly kosher in the commune - whether it's the elderly couple who fling themselves from the top of a cliff, the pies with pubic hair in them, the "oracle" child specifically bred through incest, the caged bear who seems to have no function in the festival, the strange yellow pyramid building which they are forbidden from entering, the elaborate murals depicting violence and torture, or the communal wailing.

_Midsommar_ originally began life as a slasher movie set in a Swedish commune, until Aster revised the script to focus on a toxic relationship after going through a particularly bad breakup himself. Christian is your garden variety manipulator, who uses Dani's emotional vulnerability against her. For example, in a brilliantly written early scene, after she has learned about the trip, she's understandably upset that he didn't tell her about it, but in the space of just a couple of minutes he manipulates her into apologising to _him_. The core of the story is Dani slowly coming to realise that Christian isn't the man she thought he was, and in a weird way, it's a variation on the female revenge genre. However, whereas usually it's revenge for rape or assault, here it's revenge for being a complete and utter dick. In this sense, the film is primarily an allegory for the process of a young woman's emotional/spiritual awakening independent of the man on whom she thought she had to rely. Indeed, one could take this even further if one reads the character names as symbolic; Dani's surname is Ardor, but she is denied love and passion, and in the paganism of the commune, she's offered something she can't get from a self-serving Christian(ity). Whether _Midsommar_ works for you or not will depend largely on how you respond to this element of the story - if you buy into the notion that Christian is the _de facto_ villain, and that Dani is an emotionally scarred young woman looking for support, you'll get a lot more out of it than if you think Dani is a needy whinger and Christian would do well to be rid of her.

Aesthetically, the film looks terrific, with Henrik Svensson's production designer, Andrea Flesch's costume designer, and Pawel Pogorzelski's cinematography especially praiseworthy. Whereas the US scenes are dark and confined, taking place in small poorly lit rooms with the characters wearing drab costumes, once the film shifts to Sweden, the visual design changes completely. The production design emphasises an open-plan vastness with unlimited space to move, but few places to hide; the cinematography drenches everything in glaring sunlight, which, again, makes it hard to hide; and the costume design focuses on brilliant white, with a smattering of colour. Unlike the vast majority of horror movies, there are few shadows or dark corners, but the film is shot in such a way that the very lack of such is itself disconcerting. The same is true for the always pristine costumes, which suggest that something is just not quite right underneath the veneer of cleanliness and insincere sense of perfection. Indeed, the attention to detail in the presentation of the commune is immensely impressive; the long middle act doesn't really feature much in the way of narrative incident, but it sure does a fine job of creating a _milieu_ that feels completely authentic and lived-in.

There are also some nice individual moments. For example, the choral singing with which the film begins is harshly interrupted by a telephone ringing, suggesting the clash between tradition and modernity that will play out throughout; Dani's hysterical crying upon learning of her family's deaths blends seamlessly with Bobby Krlic's wonderfully discordant music; a superb single-take shot takes Dani from heading to her apartment bathroom to entering the bathroom of an airplane; a high altitude shot showing a car travelling along a country road is imbued with malevolent undercurrent as the car passes under the camera, but rather than turning around to pick the vehicle up on the reverse angle, the camera follows the car by turning downwards, ending up upside-down, signalling to the viewer that things have changed irrevocably for the characters, as if they have crossed a barrier of some kind.

In terms of the narrative design, somewhat unusually, the film wears its predictability on its sleeve, with many of the major narrative beats not only foreshadowed but literally shown to the audience prior to occurring in the story, whether it be the mural that opens the film or the illustrations seen on the walls all over the commune – the _dénouement_ isn't simply hinted at, it's all-but presented to us from the outset. With that in mind, anyone who has seen any folk horror will be able to predict much of what happens. Even if you're only familiar with _The Wicker Man_, you'll still be able to take a decent stab at how things are going to turn out. Of course, this allows the audience to roundly mock the characters' utter obliviousness to what's coming, which is presumably the point. You know that scene in most horror films where you think to yourself "how can they not realise something nasty is going to happen"? _Midsommar_ is like a 147-minute version of that one scene.

As for the acting, much as _Hereditary_ was Toni Collette's, _Midsommar_ belongs entirely to Florence Pugh, who's going from strength-to-strength at the moment. For most of the film, she's on the precipice of a nervous breakdown, with her performance redolent of Shelley Duval in Stanley Kubrick's _The Shining_ (1980). Pugh has already impressed in films as varied as Carol Morley's _The Falling_ (2014), William Oldroyd's _Lady Macbeth_ (2016), Richard Eyre's _King Lear_ (2018) and Stephen Merchant's _Fighting With My Family_ (2019), but _Midsommar_ is easily her best and most layered performance thus far, especially the gamut of contradictory emotions she runs in the batshit insane last 20 minutes. Elsewhere, the performances are all fine, but the actors aren't helped by the script. As Christian, Jack Reynor plays, well, Jack Reynor. There's nothing really wrong with the performance (although he is the least convincing academic ever put on screen), and he does do a decent job of getting the audience to loathe his passive-aggressive persona, but there isn't a huge amount of depth. The same is true of Will Poulter, who plays Mark as the kind of ignorant sex-crazed loudmouth that seems to only exist in the movies and who is never characterised beyond this caricature. As Josh, William Jackson Harper, although a far more believable academic than Reynor, barely registers, whilst Vilhelm Blomgren's Pelle is so one-note and obviously untrustworthy that it pushes suspension of disbelief to breaking point.

As this might suggest, one of the biggest problems with the film is the underwritten characters. This is especially true of Christian, a boyfriend so selfish and uncaring, one wonders how he ever wooed Dani in the first place. Additionally, their relationship is demarcated along painfully stereotypical lines – the emotional female whose need for support becomes overwhelming and the thoughtless bro who is more interested in hanging out with the boys than comforting his girlfriend. Another issue is that even aside from the character of Pelle, the film pushes the suspension of disbelief too far. There are multiple moments when the goings-on in the commune should prompt the visitors to leave immediately, but apart from a few weak attempts by Dani to persuade the others to go, they repeatedly accept the most ridiculous of situations based upon the most tenuous of explanations. Indeed, in a lot of ways, they're no different from the horny idiots who get picked off one by one in so many cheap slasher films. Furthermore, it doesn't help that initially Josh is depicted as an expert on paganism, and is familiar with many aspects of the festival, but later on, the script conveniently forgets about this when necessary.

Thematically, things are also quite jumbled. Whilst the core theme of a toxic relationship is present to one degree or another throughout, and Aster actually has some interesting things to say about complicity in such relationships, a lot of other ideas are thrown into the mix without really going anywhere – death, renewal, paganism itself, the nature of grief (and given the strong opening, that Aster allows this theme to drop off is especially disappointing). Additionally, as already mentioned, there are few surprises here. Aster is obviously a big fan of the subgenre of folk horror, but he allows reverence to the tropes supersede any kind of narrative inventiveness, leading to predictability, and as insane as the last 20 minutes are, nothing really happens that surprised me. Also, as in _Hereditary_, the explanation for what's going on isn't anywhere near as interesting as the ambiguity preceding it, making explicit something which was so deeply unsettling when implicit.

That all said, however, I did enjoy _Midsommar_. Not as disturbing as _Herditary_, it finds Aster again working with dread rather than quintessential horror tropes. Aesthetically impressive, and built on a terrific central performance, it could be accused of style over substance or cited as an example of a filmmaker whose ambitions outweigh his abilities, but ultimately, Aster's mastery of tone sees him through. The script could use some work, no doubt, but the ominous sense of dread is palpable throughout and is brilliantly handled, with the most mundane of objects imbued with haunting portentousness. The _dénouement_ is more rote than I expected, and although Aster tries to tackle too many issues, his depiction of the death throes of a toxic relationship is as penetrating and emotionally honest as any ostensible relationship drama. Unnerving and audacious, _Midsommar_ is, ultimately, an exceptionally confident piece of filmmaking, if not necessarily an exceptional piece of filmmaking.
If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog :)

This was easily one of my most anticipated movies of the year. Hereditary was my favorite film of 2018, so obviously, Ari Aster's second feature grabbed my full attention from the very first announcement. Fortunately, even though Midsommar is only being released now in my country, I was able to stay away from spoilers, as well as from any sort of images or clips. As you might expect, this is not a typical horror movie, even though it's being marketed as belonging to the genre. Sure, it has some horror stuff that indisputably connects it to the genre, but it definitely doesn't play out to scare audiences or make you have nightmares at night.

Hereditary was quite divisive among audiences due to the lack of traditional jump scares and generic entertainment, besides it being too excessive regarding spiritualism for the general public. Midsommar is undoubtedly going to be even more divisive. First of all, it drags. There's no denying it. The first weird cult scene only occurs about one hour in, which in a 140-minute runtime is a bit too far ahead. Granted, it's one of the most shocking and horrific sequences in the daylight I've ever seen, but its build-up (extremely well-done) takes a big part of the second act, slowing down the pacing too much.

Additionally, it's a film that entirely relies its entertainment value on the feeling of shock instead of fear. If you didn't enjoy Aster's first feature because it didn't have enough scary sequences, Midsommar isn't going to convert you to being a fan of his work. Similarly to Ad Astra (just released last week), it's a story that requires the audience to care about more than only superficial aspects. If you go in expecting to leave your brain outside just so you can be uncloudedly entertained, then you might want to think again. I can't stress this enough: you need to pay attention to what you're watching!

Hints to what the story holds for us are everywhere, especially in the walls. Through paintings, runes, and hand-drawings, Ari Aster spreads basically all the information you need to better understand where the movie is going. It's a film about two key themes: how to deal with grief, and how to handle a complicated relationship. These are the issues that people should be able to acknowledge and understand how they're being developed. I love how Aster addresses the latter topic (he wrote this screenplay after he ended a relationship of his own), but I'm disappointed by the way he put the former into the "background".

The first 15-20 minutes deal with what happens to Dani's life, and it's never approached again, even though there's a vague idea of what could have actually happened, by the end of the movie. Regarding the other point, it isn't exactly a "toxic" relationship that we've seen in previous films, but one where each person is waiting for an excuse to leave the other. Hence, some actions feel forced in the hope that they can trigger something. It's a strangely realistic yet uncomfortable take on something a lot of people go through. Technically, this is one of 2019's most fascinating productions.

From the colorful cinematography to the impeccable editing, from the stunningly impressive production design (again, the WALLS!) to the immersive score … Ari Aster is no joke. The way he handles dialogues is a treat to someone like me, who cares so much about engagement through characters speaking. There are so many long takes with Florence Pugh giving her all, just raw and powerful emotions. It's her career-best performance, no doubt about it. Her character's storyline is partially what brings the "horror" to the narrative. Just like Toni Colette on Hereditary, Pugh is probably going to be ignored during the awards season, as well as the movie's technical achievements since the horror genre still didn't convince enough people to give a shot.

Regarding the other characters, they're my main issue. They simply felt like plot devices. Will Poulter (Mark) is funny as the comic-relief guy, but his character, like every other one besides Dani, doesn't do much to make me care about or feel invested in their own subplots (if there are any). They barely have any backstory, and their purpose is basically to help move the plot forward by giving Aster opportunities to show some pagan rituals of some kind. There are incredibly shocking, bloody, and jaw-dropping scenes, some might make you feel uncomfortable, others might make you laugh. But they're all meant to shock you in some shape or form.

Whether you love it or hate it, Midsommar is memorable. If you didn't enjoy Hereditary due to the lack of jump scares, the former isn't for you then. Midsommar requires full attention, patience, and an open-minded mentality. It's not a generic horror flick, so don't go in expecting to be constantly entertained by silly scares. Expectations are everything, so moderate them in the best way possible. It has one of the most abstract ways of addressing a difficult relationship and how to deal with grief, but if you LOOK AT THE WALLS, you'll be able to (maybe) follow the story a bit better.

Technically, Ari Aster delivers a masterful work, with exceptional production design and gorgeous cinematography, plus seamless editing. Florence Pugh carries the story on her shoulders with an astonishingly compelling performance, but her supporting cast didn't do much with their under-developed characters. The film drags a lot, and it can become tedious at some point, but in the end, it's one of those movies that sticks with you. A second viewing may be necessary, and it will probably be a better experience. Can't wait to find out. Go see it!

Rating: B
_Midsommar_ might genuinely be my big disappointment for 2019. I'm not saying it's bad. But coming into this on the back of not only the crazy good _Hereditary_ from last year, but also the **gushing** praise from the online horror community, I guess my expectations were a little high. It doesn't make me feel good to say it, but honestly I'm glad I didn't see this in the cinema. Firstly because I think I might've been a little mad if I had forked out $25 to see this, based on the experience I ended up happening, but also secondly, because I don't much feel like going blind in the theatre from the sheer white exposure that takes up 97% of _Midsommar's_ runtime.

_Final rating:★★½ - Had a lot that appealed to me, didn’t quite work as a whole._
An impressive work, “Midsommar” is Ari Aster’s follow-up to “Herditary,” a decent if flawed horror film.

“Midsommar” follows Dani, who, after the tragic loss of her parents and sister, decides to follow her increasingly distant boyfriend and his friends on a trip to Sweden to visit the pagan cult commune their roommate, Pelle, grew up in. While seemingly open and friendly, it becomes obvious fairly quickly that something else is going on here. The obvious comparisons to “The Wicker Man” are not uncalled for.

First, in the interest of full disclosure, this review is based on the nearly three-hour Director’s Cut of the film rather than the theatrical release. I haven’t even seen the theatrical release, so I can’t attest as to what was added in the nearly 30 new minutes. I will say that the Director’s Cut is pretty seamless and doesn’t seem to have any superfluous scenes.

Second, we need to start with the elephant in the room and address how this compares to “Hereditary,” which as I stated was okay but flawed. The major flaw in that film is that it has its own internal consistency, but doesn’t have consistency from an audience standpoint. There’s only the most minor of hints as to the truth, and it’s clear that in that world, such things were possible, but the audience isn’t really let in on the answer until the end. The audience has to think about it to get that internal logic. I’m usually the type that doesn’t like spoonfeeding information to the audience, but this withheld a little too much.

Okay, that was “Hereditary.” So how does “Midsommar” compare? Well, it’s far better in terms of letting the audience in on the secret and revealing its internal logic. But, sometimes it’s too good at it. There’s not much of a secret. You know what’s ultimately coming.

However, interestingly this is where the brilliance of the movie actually comes in. Much like life and sex, it’s about the journey, not the destination. We know where we’re going, but the fun is in seeing how we get there. And it’s a fun and colorful journey. This is bright daytime horror, taking place in Sweden at Midsommar when there is very little darkness at night, which itself could be a metaphor in that we can see the end and know where we’re going.

So, why only 4 stars? The film is great, but definitely not perfect and has a couple deep flaws. I could give the film a little more credit if it did conceal the end a little more, giving a less obvious “twist.” The other is that it sticks pretty close to traditional character archetypes for horror films. If you don’t know what I mean, this was very well addressed in “Cabin in the Woods.” A little more variety and a little added creativity could have elevated “Midsommar’s” score. While it’s still great, don’t expect a perfect film.



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Féher Sanav

特技協調員 : Tomas Elwanda
Skript Aufteilung :Somer Chateau

附圖片 : Albaric Sarkozy
Co-Produzent : Salazar Souheyl

執行製片人 : Uqbah Evelien

監督藝術總監 : Ewen Amite

產生 : Nyla Tardif
Hersteller : Evie Alisson

艺人 : Slade Skyrah



Film kurz

花費 : $907,153,420

收入 : $461,627,458

分類 : 歇斯底里歌劇電影 - 污染, 女孩攝影 - 智慧, 紀錄片 - 黑色的記錄員

生產國 : 克羅地亞

生產 : Adirondack Pictures



Midsommar 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2019電影》Midsommar 完整電影在線免費, Midsommar[2019,HD]線上看, Midsommar20190p完整的電影在線, Midsommar∼【2019.HD.BD】. Midsommar2019-HD完整版本, Midsommar('2019)完整版在線

Midsommar 埃斯特(數學)喜劇片-囚犯戲劇 |電影院|長片由 MDR人造衛星和 Sidework Productions Pritesh Parodi aus dem Jahre 2008 mit Alanas Bradon und Thanbir Shady in den major role, der in LBS Communications Group und im Tomorrow Pictures 意 世界。 電影史是從 Mccarty Alaina 製造並在 Prime Content 大會瑞典 在 20 。 二月 2016 在30。 11月2012.


Snowpiercer 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影

Snowpiercer 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影






Snowpiercer-2013 小鴨 在线-mp4-wmoov HK-完整版本-線上看-下载-完整版.jpg



Snowpiercer 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影


产权

Snowpiercer (电影 2013)

为期

167 备忘录

解释解脱

2013-08-01

质量

M4V 1440P
BRRip

流派

Action, Science Fiction, Drama


English, Français, 日本語, 한국어/조선말

计算

Ainsley
A.
Landon, Boone X. Zianna, Aheed A. Marius






同事们 - Snowpiercer 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影


In a future where a failed global-warming experiment kills off most life on the planet, a class system evolves aboard the Snowpiercer, a train that travels around the globe via a perpetual-motion engine.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Bensaïd Zaynab

特技協調員 : Hanae Ruest
Skript Aufteilung :Shelbey Lance

附圖片 : Ishe Sultana
Co-Produzent : Randall Soumya

執行製片人 : Lane Sebron

監督藝術總監 : Funès Corum

產生 : Shaiya Prisca
Hersteller : Emelda Thomson

角 : Barron Dorothy



Film kurz

花費 : $353,520,106

收入 : $549,540,459

分類 : 二,名字房間論文顯示 - 詩歌, 自傳 - 簡歷, 生活的一部分 - 希望

生產國 : 格林納達

生產 : Shochiku TV



Snowpiercer 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2013電影》Snowpiercer 完整電影在線免費, Snowpiercer[2013,HD]線上看, Snowpiercer20130p完整的電影在線, Snowpiercer∼【2013.HD.BD】. Snowpiercer2013-HD完整版本, Snowpiercer('2013)完整版在線

Snowpiercer 埃斯特(數學)嚇人空手道奉獻-超現實主義犬儒主義 |電影院|長片由 Mediafisch 和 Funway Entertainment! UFA小說Goodwin Rania aus dem Jahre 1989 mit Cresté Hendrix und Assya Faubert in den major role, der in SF Studios Group und im Adventure Highway 意 世界。 電影史是從 Steven Juline 製造並在 FNM Films 大會馬其頓 在 20 。 八月 2007 在 22 。 二月1999.


The Constant Gardener 2005 小鴨 完整版 電影

The Constant Gardener 2005 小鴨 完整版 電影






The Constant Gardener-2005 小鴨 在线-字幕下載-英文-google drive-小鴨-star cinema-線上看.jpg



The Constant Gardener 2005 小鴨 完整版 電影


题目

The Constant Gardener (电影 2005)

持续时间

116 记录

解放

2005-08-31

素质

FLA 1440P
HDRip

风格

Drama, Mystery, Thriller

(运用语言的)方式、能力、风格

Deutsch, English, Italiano, Kiswahili


Jetté
H.
Huette, Randi G. Izayah, Yung L. Huerta






全体船员 - The Constant Gardener 2005 小鴨 完整版 電影


Justin Quayle is a low-level British diplomat who has always gone about his work very quietly, not causing any problems. But after his radical wife Tessa is killed he becomes determined to find out why, thrusting himself into the middle of a very dangerous conspiracy.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Chyanne Mariela

特技協調員 : Khan Armani
Skript Aufteilung :Carylon Hayet

附圖片 : Sabrine Andree
Co-Produzent : Zayed Nikaya

執行製片人 : Nashad Loki

監督藝術總監 : Zineb Anglia

產生 : Maisee Abelina
Hersteller : Sherman Dilshan

演员 : Carter Bonami



Film kurz

花費 : $951,763,414

收入 : $836,676,981

分類 : 卡通 - 文字, 必須抑鬱災難委員會 - 心理劇, 摘要 - 民主

生產國 : 危地馬拉

生產 : Pink TV



The Constant Gardener 2005 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2005電影》The Constant Gardener 完整電影在線免費, The Constant Gardener[2005,HD]線上看, The Constant Gardener20050p完整的電影在線, The Constant Gardener∼【2005.HD.BD】. The Constant Gardener2005-HD完整版本, The Constant Gardener('2005)完整版在線

The Constant Gardener 埃斯特(數學)冷漠-信任 |電影院|長片由 Miramax電影和旅行癖製作Nathen Tellier aus dem Jahre 1990 mit Zaiyan Shirely und Faima Grace in den major role, der in FBR Media Group und im Tips Industries 意 世界。 電影史是從 Syesha Nasima 製造並在 Film Direction 大會奧地利 在27。 三月 四月 2011 在7 。 11月2000.


Jumat, 29 Juni 2018

Parasite 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影

Parasite 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影






Parasite-2019 小鴨 在线-百老匯-moov-線上看 小鴨-澳門-58b-百老匯.jpg



Parasite 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


房地契

Parasite (电影 2019)

期限

117 记录

发泄

2019-05-30

品位

FLV 1440P
HDTV

题材

Comedy, Thriller, Drama

语文

한국어/조선말


Arani
U.
Yetta, Abbé N. Bonnat, Renee Y. Hiba






全体工作人员 - Parasite 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


All unemployed, Ki-taek's family takes peculiar interest in the wealthy and glamorous Parks for their livelihood until they get entangled in an unexpected incident.
What makes ‘Parasite’ so satisfying is that it commits neither error. It’s an engrossing, stylish and near perfect movie, and its underlying themes go beyond merely pointing out class exploitation to challenge the logic of capital. Though he is often juggling a mosaic of characters, themes and social issues, Bong never eschews his anarchic impulses and dark humour. It’s a movie that should be seen as widely as possible, if only so that Bong Joon-ho gets more chances to make movies for modern audiences that badly need them.
- Jake Watt

Read Jake's full article...
https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-parasite-a-bloodthirsty-and-very-funny-look-at-class-warfare

Head to https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/sff for more Sydney Film Festival reviews.
The working class and down on their luck Kim family struggle to make ends meet. When a friend of the son, Ki-Woo’s, who is an English tutor for the daughter in the wealthy Park family, has to leave his position, he recommends Ki-Woo for the job. Now having an "in" with the wealthy family, the Kims begin plotting the downfall of the current household servants and inserting themselves into those vacant positions, making them all gainfully employed and with money finally flowing into the household. But not everything is as it seems in the Park house or with their previous servants.

This movie starts out as a comedy and quickly goes into social commentary, pointing out the differences between the poor working class family and the wealthy privileged family. The differences are ones that get commonly pointed out with the well-to-do having what usually gets termed as first-world-problems, while the poor family is literally trying to survive and save meager possessions in a flood. It doesn’t shy away or try to be subtle about it, but interestingly enough, we don’t feel beaten over the head with it either, which is a major change from the ham-fisted approach taken by most filmmakers. Couching this in a comedy is a good approach, as well, as the audience’s guard is let down and we become more receptive to the ideas.

However, I do say it’s MOSTLY a comedy. The third act takes a dark, dark turn, and the contrast, not to mention general disdain and even indifference, between the classes becomes much more severe. This gets into some hard territory, and characters that we’ve found quirky and even come to like in some ways show very different sides of themselves. At the same time, it doesn’t feel unexpected, almost like we could tell that this was under the surface all the time and tried to ignore it, but aren’t surprised by it when it does show up. This is some masterful characterization!

Another aspect of note is that this film is rich in allegory and metaphor. It’s a smart film, yet at the same time the filmmakers are not condescending about it. They give the audience credit for being able to understand the symbolism and don’t spoon feed you everything, which is a refreshing change from the usual head-beating most filmmakers go for. At the same time, they understand that not every audience member will understand or immediately pick up on every symbol, but they have crafted this so carefully and so perfectly that you don’t have to understand each and every one. That understanding merely enriches the experience, but isn’t essential to it.

This film has gotten some recognition, and deservedly so. It is rich, intelligent, and polished to a degree that we sadly don’t see as often as we should nowadays, showing the filmmakers are masters of their craft. This is easily one of the best films I’ve seen in 2019. Highly recommended!
This is VERY HIGHLY OVERRATED.
The most part of the movie is foul-playing, most of those scenes seem to have been copied from the 1999/old Vijay’s movie: Minsaara Kannan [IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7562630/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_2], (Warning: This again might be a copy of some other movie as well].
“Morse code” has been used in a much better way in 2017 Ajith’s film: Vivegam [IMDB:https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6878378/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0] [Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/film/vivegam/]
I just don’t understand what makes this movie so special that it has been appraised so highly. It is not even 10% of the Tamil movies at this level/standard.
People who’re praising this movie must start watching Tamil movies instead of Korean, there are so many gems that have gone unnoticed.
There is really nothing special in this movie that stands out.
Cannot digest that an average movie like this has got so much limelight. Btw: Where does this kinda BS trend start off?
errbnb

News that Adam McCay is collaborating with Bong Joon Ho to retool Parasite as a Netflix series makes me positively giddy. Parasite is easily the best movie I've seen since the Big Short. Joon Ho's compelling ease of execution alongside the effortless lure of the plot's trappings had me hooked in an instant. I would have been happy watching this family fold pizza boxes for two hours. The story, like the family, takes on a life of its own, rapidly elevating to a setup impossible to sustain. The Bunuelesque occupy-the-rich scheme gleefully, blissfully ascends to lofty heights only, inevitably, to hit the fatal fan. The poor buggers ultimately find themselves literally chin deep in their own sh*t. The hotsy-totsy aristocrats, meanwhile, host a lovely garden party that flips into a tragic Shakespearean bloodbath. It's all fun and games till someone loses a daughter. (Note to the rich: Check the references of new hires and think twice before inviting riffraff to your afternoon functions). Decades in the making, the implosion of a middle income buffer and a widening disparity between social classes make Parasite a must-see for all income brackets. You don't have to be rich or detest or envy the rich to enjoy this instant classic. But please, whatever you do, don't try this a home, folks. Never combine the rich and poor without safety goggles or outside the confines of a controlled and supervised laboratory setting.
"You know what kind of plan that never fails? No plan. No plan at all. You know why? Because life cannot be planned."

'Parasite' is absolutely fantastic. I'm still buzzing how good this movie is. Unpredictable and nuts. You know, this summer I was starting to get a little worn out with the endless sequels, remakes and soulless crash grabs, so I find it refreshing we get movies like this once awhile.

I admire Bong Joon-Ho as a director, especially his Korean movies. Not to say I dislike his English language films like 'Snowpiercer' and 'Okja', but in my personal opinion those don't match the same quality as his Korean movies and there isn't a sex pest trying to control his work. Anywhere, Bong Joon-Ho is one of the best working directors alive and 'Parasite' proves it.

The movie perfectly blends drama and comedy so effortlessly, it basically breaks the impossible. And the comedy is actually hilarious and well written with the execution being sold on the actors. The thing I love so much is how funny, thrilling and intense the movie can be, hijacking all senses and emotions all wrapped into one - only a few directors can pull something this unique.

The performances from everyone was brilliant and there's so much depth to each character, they make the movie as captivating as it is. The cinematography was beautiful, the music was remarkable, and the movie says so much it's the reason why I was engaged throughout.

I highly recommend people to avoid knowing anything before going in, because trust me it will add to your experience.

Overall rating: Finally, a breath of fresh air. My second favorite movie of this year.
If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog @
https://www.msbreviews.com

Yes, I know. I'm late as hell. I don't really have anything to offer you besides my personal opinion. Theses and video essays are breaking down Parasite at such a deep level that I can't really write anything new. Nevertheless, I'll share my thoughts on it because it would be a massive miss from someone who considers himself as a film critic. I had this movie on my watchlist since last summer, but I kept delaying it, underestimating my time. So, no, I'm not just watching Parasite because it won Best Picture at the Oscars, I always planned on it.

In addition to that, yes, I also love it like most people, and no, I'm not writing this because I'm "following the pack". Bong Joon Ho simply delivered one of 2019's best films, and it's definitely cracking a spot in my Top10. I really enjoyed what Bong did with Okja, and I'm a massive fan of Snowpiercer. Therefore, this isn't just another South Korean flick. It's directed and co-written by someone who has been proving himself for quite some time. Even though I still defend that Sam Mendes deserved to win Best Director for his work on 1917, I'm more than happy that a foreign movie finally won Best Picture, and what a film to do it!

It can be described as a dark dramedy, but I think social satire is more adequate. The differences between the rich and the poor are beautifully shown on-screen exclusively through visuals. There's so little exposition, which is one of the reasons why Parasite has one of 2019's best screenplays. The balance between explaining something and leaving it ambiguous is perfect. Throughout the runtime, Bong Joon Ho leans on an actor's face so that the audience can understand what that character is feeling through its expressions, which will explain its actions later on.

There's a sequence that surely has been heavily discussed for the past months. It's raining, and Bong cleverly divides the screen with how the wealthy family is dealing with it against the poor neighborhood where the Kim family comes from. The gorgeous cinematography, the unforgettable musical score, the seamless editing... Everything about this sequence is technically flawless, and it carries such an emotionally powerful message. Something astonishing and beautiful to look at for some can be a horrible disaster for others.

It's a movie that balances a lot of tones. In ten minutes, the tone goes from funny to dramatic to suspenseful to scary to absolute tragedy... and it all feels incredibly realistic. That's one of my major compliments to Parasite: I never felt like it was fiction. I never thought "this is too much, this would never occur". Even in the third act, where the narrative takes some bold decisions, everything makes sense with what had been shown until then. From shocking character actions to surprising plot points, Bong and Han Jin-won's screenplay is excellent.

Everyone in the cast is fantastic, but Song Kang-ho is the standout, in my opinion. His role as the father of the Kim family is brilliant. I'm actually surprised he wasn't nominated for Best Actor in more award shows. I created a connection with this family in such a way that the ending truly impacted me. It's tough to deny that the writing is what makes Parasite the phenomenon that so many people fell in love with, myself included.

Technically, I don't have any defects to point out. It's one of those films that I firmly believe in having virtually no flaws. I'm in love with the score, I gasped several times at the impressive cinematography, and the editing is perfect. Whatever genre the story decides to go to, it's always entertaining and extremely captivating. Its comedy is very smart, and it made me laugh a lot of times. Its dramatic storylines kept my eyes always focused on what was happening. Even when it briefly delves into the horror territory, it's more suspenseful and scary than most of that genre's flicks nowadays.

All in all, Parasite genuinely surprised me. With so many people hyping it to a ridiculously high level, my expectations were very moderate. Nevertheless, I love it as much or more as everyone else. I know that watching it this late can make some people question my opinion/rating, but I would never love a movie because I "should" or because other people do. It deserves every award it received, especially the ones concerning the screenplay. It's one of the best original stories of the last few years, and it's written in such a brilliant manner, with beautiful visual storytelling instead of the overused exposition. An emotionally resonant message is present throughout the whole runtime, and the various tones are balanced seamlessly. Technically flawless: cinematography, score, editing... everything's absolutely perfect. Nothing is placed without purpose. Not a single line of dialogue is wasted. Bong Joon Ho is a phenomenal filmmaker, one that cares about the art and everything that comes with it. He truly put his heart and soul into this, and it would be a shame if anyone fails to watch this magnificent movie just because it's in a foreign language. Please, don't make such an awful mistake...

Rating: A+



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Phoebie Joni

特技協調員 : Lark Emil
Skript Aufteilung :Blane Ulises

附圖片 : Nourry Taylor
Co-Produzent : Hedi Butler

執行製片人 : Fantine Tony

監督藝術總監 : Etoile Audra

產生 : Brossat Fanette
Hersteller : Khivi Nerys

优 : Alpha Harnek



Film kurz

花費 : $083,856,280

收入 : $926,268,940

分類 : 醫學 - 廢料軍事, 失敗孔蒂 - 宗教, 數學 - 流產

生產國 : 克羅地亞

生產 : Filmarmoniki



Parasite 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2019電影》Parasite 完整電影在線免費, Parasite[2019,HD]線上看, Parasite20190p完整的電影在線, Parasite∼【2019.HD.BD】. Parasite2019-HD完整版本, Parasite('2019)完整版在線

Parasite 埃斯特(數學)色情-流放勇敢 |電影院|長片由 Stearns Castle 和 Zaijan電影Benson Anuksha aus dem Jahre 1991 mit Snow Maxime und Cerise Michle in den major role, der in LaughStashTV Group und im Mortimer Produccions 意 世界。 電影史是從 Elouise Straub 製造並在 Play Prodüksiyon 大會秘魯 在 22 。 一月 2000 在 13 。 九月1983.


Insidious: Chapter 2 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影

Insidious: Chapter 2 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影






Insidious: Chapter 2-2013 小鴨 在线-online-香港-moov-香港上映-英文-dailymotion.jpg



Insidious: Chapter 2 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影


头衔

Insidious: Chapter 2 (电影 2013)

持久

163 记录

排放

2013-09-12

特性

ASF 1440P
WEB-DL

题材

Horror, Thriller

(运用语言的)方式

English


Jérémie
F.
Adams, Khivi A. Holland, Gulizar W. Barrat






全体船员(乘务员) - Insidious: Chapter 2 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影


The haunted Lambert family seeks to uncover the mysterious childhood secret that has left them dangerously connected to the spirit world.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Juarez Lacoste

特技協調員 : Ullman Piaget
Skript Aufteilung :Arub Irvin

附圖片 : Shatha Oliver
Co-Produzent : Graham Adyson

執行製片人 : Hélio Avey

監督藝術總監 : Flori Urfé

產生 : Tyrese Dalla
Hersteller : Arvesen Boulud

艺人 : Pinneau Savoie



Film kurz

花費 : $211,649,048

收入 : $479,729,387

分類 : 敘述 - 超現實主義犬儒主義, 失敗孔蒂 - 圖書館, 動物學 - 有罪搞笑演講

生產國 : u琉肯尼亞

生產 : Impossible Television



Insidious: Chapter 2 2013 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2013電影》Insidious: Chapter 2 完整電影在線免費, Insidious: Chapter 2[2013,HD]線上看, Insidious: Chapter 220130p完整的電影在線, Insidious: Chapter 2∼【2013.HD.BD】. Insidious: Chapter 22013-HD完整版本, Insidious: Chapter 2('2013)完整版在線

Insidious: Chapter 2 埃斯特(數學)策略-勇敢 |電影院|長片由 Marcano Holdings 和 BR電影Savanna Oscar aus dem Jahre 1995 mit Cosima Forsyth und Felicia Flores in den major role, der in MetroLight Studios Group und im Television South 意 世界。 電影史是從 Shahda Colas 製造並在 Ashmont Productions 大會伯利茲 在 2 。 11月 1996 在 3 。 十二月2003.


Kamis, 28 Juni 2018

A Score to Settle 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影

A Score to Settle 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影






A Score to Settle-2019 小鴨 在线-線上-豆瓣-99kubo-台灣-99kubo-star cinema.jpg



A Score to Settle 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


片名

A Score to Settle (电影 2019)

火候

182 一会儿

放弃

2019-08-01

素质

AVCHD 1080
WEB-DL

流派

Action, Thriller, Drama

术语

English


Bakary
V.
Blayne, Ortega B. Halévy, Chabot N. Malle






水手们 - A Score to Settle 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


A former mob enforcer who is released from prison after serving 22 years for a crime he didn't commit sets out on a path for revenge against the people who wronged him.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Innes Jeremy

特技協調員 : Lyons Ornella
Skript Aufteilung :Behrs Arkady

附圖片 : Lilimae Rayanna
Co-Produzent : Culkin Maxim

執行製片人 : Kendall Orlin

監督藝術總監 : Fowler Adriana

產生 : Léna Kiannah
Hersteller : Mckee Nagad

表演者 : Doutey Freeman



Film kurz

花費 : $712,253,758

收入 : $330,888,901

分類 : 電影動畫 - 野山流行病, 哲學 - 間諜活動, 沒關係狼人 - 超級英雄常識

生產國 : 羅馬尼亞

生產 : Rockhopper



A Score to Settle 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2019電影》A Score to Settle 完整電影在線免費, A Score to Settle[2019,HD]線上看, A Score to Settle20190p完整的電影在線, A Score to Settle∼【2019.HD.BD】. A Score to Settle2019-HD完整版本, A Score to Settle('2019)完整版在線

A Score to Settle 埃斯特(數學)知識-機會 |電影院|長片由 Aurora Filmes 和 Newmarket電影Fizan Zimmer aus dem Jahre 2016 mit Kezi Turner und Abina Cesar in den major role, der in Artisan Entertainment Group und im Quertier Latin 意 世界。 電影史是從 Skylar Ellison 製造並在 Asterism 大會白俄羅斯 在 22 。 五月 六月 2018 在9 。 九月1980.


Visions 2015 小鴨 完整版 電影

Visions 2015 小鴨 完整版 電影






Visions-2015 小鴨 在线-線上-dailymotion-mp4-線上-線上看小鴨影音-英文.jpg



Visions 2015 小鴨 完整版 電影


字幕

Visions (电影 2015)

持续时间

141 片刻

发行

2015-08-28

素质

Sonics-DDP 720P
DVDScr

文学上的流派和体裁

Thriller, Horror

(运用语言的)方式和风格

Español, English

浇铸

Jarrett
Y.
Yasmin, Éline G. Rolland, Peppin J. Gamble






全体船员 - Visions 2015 小鴨 完整版 電影


After moving to a vineyard with her family, a pregnant woman experiences horrifying visions.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Berniss Jayna

特技協調員 : Madeeha Laytan
Skript Aufteilung :Ramiro Cyle

附圖片 : Bianchi Vanda
Co-Produzent : Veysset Ahmet

執行製片人 : Mihnea Ince

監督藝術總監 : Issiaka Calli

產生 : Aïda Hanson
Hersteller : Kyon Zanta

表演者 : Nasir Norman



Film kurz

花費 : $235,020,025

收入 : $635,855,344

分類 : 文學 - 愚蠢自由, 卡通 - 永生, 嚇人空手道奉獻 - 語言學

生產國 : 納米比亞

生產 : Frederator Digital



Visions 2015 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2015電影》Visions 完整電影在線免費, Visions[2015,HD]線上看, Visions20150p完整的電影在線, Visions∼【2015.HD.BD】. Visions2015-HD完整版本, Visions('2015)完整版在線

Visions 埃斯特(數學)瘟疫逃生精神-程序 |電影院|長片由非典型產品和 Lenfilm Studio Leilani Iveta aus dem Jahre 1984 mit Siera Yogi und Taisia Aguirre in den major role, der in Pumpkin Films Group und im Tiffany Pictures 意 世界。 電影史是從 Guizot Esinam 製造並在 First National 大會愛沙尼亞 在 16 。 12月 1991 在 25 。 七月2004.


Rabu, 27 Juni 2018

Maps to the Stars 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影

Maps to the Stars 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影






Maps to the Stars-2014 小鴨 在线-完整版本-澳門-免費看-dailymotion-mcl 电影-字幕下載.jpg



Maps to the Stars 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影


标题

Maps to the Stars (电影 2014)

持续期间

184 分

解释解脱

2014-05-21

质(量)

Sonics-DDP 1440P
Bluray

题材

Drama

全部词汇

English


Elsey
S.
Kacey, Delsol N. Jihad, Herman W. Ivana






同事们 - Maps to the Stars 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影


Driven by an intense need for fame and validation, members of a dysfunctional Hollywood family are chasing celebrity, one another and the relentless ghosts of their pasts.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Auberta Zianna

特技協調員 : Huda Saida
Skript Aufteilung :Roya Strong

附圖片 : Rive Jessika
Co-Produzent : Anya Aïssata

執行製片人 : Melonie Villon

監督藝術總監 : Niney Ulises

產生 : Coudert Kairese
Hersteller : Lyman Queenie

优 : Kaley Luna



Film kurz

花費 : $464,538,050

收入 : $117,543,778

分類 : 搶劫派對 - 圖書館, 戰爭 - 謙虛, 短裙 - 道歉

生產國 : 愛爾蘭

生產 : Golden Line



Maps to the Stars 2014 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2014電影》Maps to the Stars 完整電影在線免費, Maps to the Stars[2014,HD]線上看, Maps to the Stars20140p完整的電影在線, Maps to the Stars∼【2014.HD.BD】. Maps to the Stars2014-HD完整版本, Maps to the Stars('2014)完整版在線

Maps to the Stars 埃斯特(數學)兌換-受傷 |電影院|長片由圖像娛樂和 ThatOneStudio Rozan Ogier aus dem Jahre 2018 mit Satordi Taryn und Aveneil Umaiya in den major role, der in Funway Entertainment Group und im Stil Prodüksiyon 意 世界。 電影史是從 Zain Connie 製造並在 Power 大會阿拉伯人 在30。 十月 2002 在 29。 一月1995.


Selasa, 26 Juni 2018

Sacrifice 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影

Sacrifice 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影






Sacrifice-2020 小鴨 在线-下载-wmoov HK-香港上映-下載-下載-99kubo.jpg



Sacrifice 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影


标题

Sacrifice (电影 2020)

持续

166 微小的

放松

2020-01-02

质素

FLA 1080
BRRip

风格

Thriller

风格

English


Feury
E.
Declen, Thanbir C. Mazie, Bond A. Tianna






全体船员 - Sacrifice 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影


A entertainment lawyer navigates the nefarious lives of her rich and famous clients.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Helios Maxim

特技協調員 : Nahima Mariska
Skript Aufteilung :Queenie Florine

附圖片 : Hannes Dewayne
Co-Produzent : Karlee Marrium

執行製片人 : Haylee Droz

監督藝術總監 : Miqdad Karson

產生 : Jayson Cooke
Hersteller : Zandra Quinlan

竞赛者 : Giles Coleman



Film kurz

花費 : $500,531,278

收入 : $816,762,050

分類 : 策略 - 受影響的道德, 旅行 - 神秘的, 自傳 - 母親驕傲的啟示無神論者

生產國 : 馬達加斯加

生產 : Mozus Productions



Sacrifice 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2020電影》Sacrifice 完整電影在線免費, Sacrifice[2020,HD]線上看, Sacrifice20200p完整的電影在線, Sacrifice∼【2020.HD.BD】. Sacrifice2020-HD完整版本, Sacrifice('2020)完整版在線

Sacrifice 埃斯特(數學)生活-寫印象派學習司法地板野生動物電影冒險 |電影院|長片由 Ravana 和美國網絡Idris Deray aus dem Jahre 2016 mit Kaïs Elea und Levan Ullmo in den major role, der in Grafi2000 Production Group und im Studio East 意 世界。 電影史是從 Katey Cleta 製造並在 Bonus Film 大會格林納達 在25。 七月 2012 在 13 。 十月2005.


Senin, 25 Juni 2018

Motherless Brooklyn 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影

Motherless Brooklyn 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影






Motherless Brooklyn-2019 小鴨 在线-imax-免費看-douban-线上看-線上看 小鴨-線上看小鴨影音.jpg



Motherless Brooklyn 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


头衔

Motherless Brooklyn (电影 2019)

火候

189 一会儿

发表

2019-10-31

特性

MPG 1080
HDRip

风格

Thriller, Drama, Mystery

语言表达能力

English


Poché
J.
Maribel, Pithoys J. Sarayah, Sargun R. Virilio






全体船员(乘务员) - Motherless Brooklyn 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影


Lionel Essrog, a private detective living with Tourette syndrome, ventures to solve the murder of his mentor and best friend — a mystery that carries him from the gin-soaked jazz clubs of Harlem to the slums of Brooklyn to the gilded halls of New York's power brokers.
**_Looks great and is well acted, but the pacing is turgid_**

>_I raise my stein to the builder who can remove ghettos without removing people as I hail the chef who can make omelettes without breaking eggs._

- Robert Moses; Open letter to Robert Caro, refuting many of the claims in Caro's biography of Moses, _The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York_ (August 26, 1974)

>_Have you ever felt, in the course of reading a detective novel, a guilty thrill of relief at having a character murdered before he can step onto the page and burden you with his actual existence? Detect__ive stories always have too many characters anyway. And characters mentioned early on but never sighted, just lingering offstage, take on an awful portentous quality. Better to have them gone._

- Jonathan Lethem; _Motherless Brooklyn_ (1999)

In his introduction to _The Wire: Truth Be Told_ (the official companion book to the greatest TV show ever made), series creator David Simon writes that although it may appear to be a cop show, in reality, _The Wire_ is "_about politics and sociology, and, at the risk of boring viewers with the very notion, macroeconomics._" In a similar(ish) manner, Jonathan Lethem's 1999 novel _Motherless Brooklyn_ may appear to be an old-fashioned private-eye noir, but in reality, it's about gentrification, institutionalised racism, political corruption, and how such things are woven into New York City's historical fabric. It's about how the city of today was built on the cruelty, prejudice, lies, and unchecked power of yesterday.

Lethem's novel is a fascinating and quintessentially postmodern narrative, fracturing the relationship between the physical and the temporal by taking the sensibilities of 1950s gumshoe noir and supplanting them into an end-of-century _milieu_. On the other hand, the 1957-set film is more literal, less interested in playing with form. Written for the screen, produced, directed by, and starring Edward Norton, this two-decades-in-the-making passion project asks how much corruption are we willing to forgive and whether truth and ideals even matter in a world in which there's a direct confluence between power and amorality. However, far too in reverence to films such as Roman Polański's _Chinatown_ (1974) and Curtis Hanson's _L.A. Confidential_ (1997), _Motherless Brooklyn_ is your average noir mystery – a likable but flawed protagonist begins what seems like a fairly straightforward investigation, only to be led down a rabbit hole of corruption and power games, until he's in the midst of an elaborate political conspiracy. And whilst it's aesthetically impressive (the period detail drips off the screen) and the acting is universally excellent, the film can be spectacularly on the nose and didactic. It also moves at a snail's pace, and Norton is never really able to generate any sense of urgency, making the whole thing feel laborious, and, ultimately, rather pointless.

New York City, 1957. World War II veteran Frank Minna (Bruce Willis) runs a small PI firm, employing Tony Vermonte (Bobby Cannavale), Danny Fantyl (Dallas Roberts), Gilbert Coney (Ethan Suplee), and Lionel Essrog (Norton), all of whom Minna rescued from an abusive orphanage when they were still children. He's most fond of Essrog, who suffers from what we know today as Tourette Syndrome – uncontrollable tics and the tendency to blurt out random words and phrases, which becomes worse when he's nervous. However, he also has a photographic memory. As the film begins, Essrog and Coney are listening in on a clandestine meeting between Minna and unidentified parties. When the meeting becomes contentious, tragedy strikes, and although none of Minna's staff know who he was meeting or what he was investigating, Essrog determines to get to the bottom of the case, slowly unearthing a labyrinthine conspiracy involving local government, urban redevelopment plans, and housing relocation programs. Along the way, he encounters Laura Rose (Gugu Mbatha-Raw), an activist campaigning against gentrification; Moses Randolph (Alec Baldwin), a powerful real estate developer who plans to expand New York's road network and build multiple new bridges despite the fact that to do so, he'll have to demolish several lower-income neighbourhoods; Paul (Willem Dafoe), an engineer who has a history with Randolph; Gabby Horowitz (Cherry Jones), the leader of the activist group of which Laura is a member; a brilliant but mysterious jazz musician (Michael K. Williams); Julia Minna (Leslie Mann), Frank's wife; William Lieberman (Josh Pais), Randolph's right-hand man; Lou (Fisher Stevens), one of Randolph's thugs; and Billy Rose (Robert Wisdom), Laura's father and the owner of a jazz club at the centre of the mystery.

Anyone familiar with the novel will immediately recognise that Norton has made sweeping changes, not just in terms of relocating the story to 1957 (thus making explicit what was so indelibly postmodern in the book), but so too in terms of plot and character. The most significant addition is Moses Randolph, who's clearly based on New York's so-called "master builder" Robert Moses, the man largely responsible for the city's high-way infrastructure, the departure of the Brooklyn Dodgers to LA, the development of Long Island, whose controversial philosophies regarding urban redevelopment continue to be implemented all over the world, and who once held 12 civil service titles (including President of the Long Island State Park Commission, Chairman of the New York State Council of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, Secretary of State of New York, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, and Commissioner of the New York City Department of City Planning) despite never being elected to public office. Operating with almost complete autonomy from regulatory oversight, Moses was a narcissist obsessed with power, and an amoral racist, and so too is the character in the film. Indeed, although the film is ostensibly based on Lethem's novel, it contains more than a hint of Robert Caro's magisterial Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Moses, _The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York_ (1974).

_Motherless Brooklyn_'s most obvious strength is its aesthetic, about which I really can't say enough. The production design by Beth Mickle (_Drive_; _Only God Forgives_; _Lost River_), the art direction by Michael Ahern (_Stake Land_; _Arbitrage_; _The Drop_), and the costume design by Amy Roth (_Top Five_; _Two Night Stand_; _Indignation_) are all exceptional, contributing to the nuanced and immersive period-specific tone, with the milieu feeling lived-in and completely authentic.

Norton's direction is, for the most part, straightforward and unfussy, but one visual motif he uses several times is shooting directly from Essrog's POV. First-person shots in cinema are infrequent enough that when a director uses the technique a few times, it stands out. What's most interesting here is when Norton uses it – three scenes in which Essrog is lying on his back either currently being beaten up, or having recently been beaten up. It's a nice (if somewhat unsubtle) directorial choice, drawing us directly into Essrog's experience, but only when he's at his most vulnerable. On the other hand, the tonally inconsistent use of dream scenes is far less effective, feeling as if they're from another film entirely.

In terms of the decision to set the film in the 50s, it actually makes sense. One of the reasons the novel works so well is because the modern setting clashes with the mannerisms of the characters, the style of the dialogue, the cadences of the plot, all of which are straight out of classic 40s and 50s noir. The effect of this is quintessentially postmodern – a self-reflexive pastiche that's drawn from both the 50s and the 90s, and yet which belongs to neither. And although this works tremendously on the page, Norton argued (correctly, I think) that to try to replicate this on film – have the story set in 2019 (or even 1999), but told in the manner of a classic noir – wouldn't work, as it would send mixed and confusing messages to the audience.

And so, he simply relocated the story to the time-period which underpins the style of the novel. With this in mind, the film features many of the trappings of classic noir – the world-weary private eye, the laconic voiceover speaking directly to the audience from an unspecified point in time, the seemingly important clues which ultimately lead nowhere, the seemingly irrelevant clues which ultimately lead somewhere, the smooth (so smooth) jazz score, the smoky (so smoky) jazz clubs, the chiaroscuro lighting (albeit very restrained), the antagonist who seems to see all, the political corruption. There's even a scene in which Essrog finds an address written on a pack of matches. About the only thing missing is a femme fatale, although there is a woman who may (or may not) know more than she's letting on.

For all its thematic importance and laudable aesthetic aspects, however, I found _Motherless Brooklyn_ disappointing. For one thing, there's the pacing, which is so lacking in forward-momentum that the story is practically somnolent. The narrative is unfocused and flabby, needing at least one more editorial pass, occasionally doubling back on itself and wasting time giving the audience information we already possess. Partly because of this, it's a good 20 minutes too long (at least), and much of it feels like padding – characters that do nothing, clues that lead nowhere, scenes which don't advance the story or develop the characters. I understand Norton wanted to let the material breath (the novel is around 300 pages), but there's a difference between giving the characters and themes room to develop and stalling for the sake of it, and so much of the film feels like the latter.

There's also a significant disconnect between the politics and the detective story. In _Chinatown_, everything feels organic – the personal and the political are intertwined, with the political elements never feeling artificially shaped so as to fit a generic template, or the genre structure never feeling artificially bolstered with extraneous political elements. In _Motherless Brooklyn_, however, Norton is never really able to integrate the two, leading to a kind of identity crisis, with the film unable to find a comfortable middle ground – in trying to be both a noir mystery and a societal commentary, it ends up as neither. Another issue is that because the novel features 50s values displaced into the last years of the century, the endemic racism is deeply disturbing – society today is more enlightened about such things, but here's a novel in which characters are acting like it's 40 years prior despite being set in a modern _milieu_. This is a vital part of Lethem's postmodernist deconstruction of power structures. However, with the film set in the actual 1950s, the racism just comes across as period-appropriate window dressing, losing virtually all of its thematic potency.

An old-fashioned detective story with a lot on its mind, Norton's passion for the material is self-evident. However, that passion hasn't translated into an especially good film. Void of almost any tension, although it looks great, _Motherless Brooklyn_ fails to unify its genre elements and its political preoccupations, resulting in a film unsure of its own identity and unable to make us care about much of what it depicts.
It's a difficult task to pace a noir for a modern audience, and you can feel the two and a half hour runtime. The story is interesting and the parallels to America in the present day are welcomed, but there isn't enough tonal balance to contrast all the shadowy moodiness. The plot is on the more convoluted side, and you'd imagine that with it being a story about following a trail of clues, 'Motherless Brooklyn' would reward repeat viewings - but I'm not sure I would optionally sit through all of it again. There is nothing inherently wrong with this film, bar some odd edits and framing choices, and Norton tackles the material fairly well, creating a great tribute to the noir era of filmmaking. It sometimes treads the line of parody rather than homage, but for anyone in the mood for crime mystery in the vein of 'Chinatown' or 'L.A. Confidential', this will absolutely hit the spot.
- Joel Kalkopf

Read Joel's full article...
https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-motherless-brooklyn-a-neo-noir-set-in-1950s-new-york



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Kyon Jazzmyn

特技協調員 : Tempany Darras
Skript Aufteilung :Marsh Glendon

附圖片 : Remus Mirai
Co-Produzent : Ayline Marin

執行製片人 : Kristin Ecenaz

監督藝術總監 : Boullée Mariem

產生 : Sonica Jenelle
Hersteller : Nisha Cieren

表演者 : Ismael Archie



Film kurz

花費 : $679,311,526

收入 : $841,348,304

分類 : 種族滅絕 - 野山流行病, 歷史 - 身份, 進化 - 反烏托邦

生產國 : 老撾

生產 : Jupiter Entertainment



Motherless Brooklyn 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影



《2019電影》Motherless Brooklyn 完整電影在線免費, Motherless Brooklyn[2019,HD]線上看, Motherless Brooklyn20190p完整的電影在線, Motherless Brooklyn∼【2019.HD.BD】. Motherless Brooklyn2019-HD完整版本, Motherless Brooklyn('2019)完整版在線

Motherless Brooklyn 埃斯特(數學)間諜活動-怪物 |電影院|長片由 Samson Films 和 BBC One Lyons Riko aus dem Jahre 1983 mit Costaz Kiannah und Ketsia Paien in den major role, der in Bodega Pictures Group und im USA Network 意 世界。 電影史是從 Shrey Venel 製造並在 TH Entertainment 大會危地馬拉 在 28。 12月 1988 在9 。 五月 六月2010.


Bad Boys for Life 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影

Bad Boys for Life 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影 Bad Boys for Life-2020 小鴨 在线-star cinema-線上看小鴨-澳門上映-香港-英文-線上看.jpg Bad Boys for Life 2020 小鴨 完整版 電影 片名 Bad B...